Better Never to Have Been

Better Never to Have Been challenges these assumptions. David Benatar argues that coming into existence is always a serious harm.

Better Never to Have Been

Author: David Benatar

Publisher: OUP Oxford

ISBN: 0191516317

Page: 256

View: 391

Most people believe that they were either benefited or at least not harmed by being brought into existence. Thus, if they ever do reflect on whether they should bring others into existence—-rather than having children without even thinking about whether they should—-they presume that they do them no harm. Better Never to Have Been challenges these assumptions. David Benatar argues that coming into existence is always a serious harm. Although the good things in one's life make one's life go better than it otherwise would have gone, one could not have been deprived by their absence if one had not existed. Those who never exist cannot be deprived. However, by coming into existence one does suffer quite serious harms that could not have befallen one had one not come into existence. Drawing on the relevant psychological literature, the author shows that there are a number of well-documented features of human psychology that explain why people systematically overestimate the quality of their lives and why they are thus resistant to the suggestion that they were seriously harmed by being brought into existence. The author then argues for the 'anti-natal' view—-that it is always wrong to have children—-and he shows that combining the anti-natal view with common pro-choice views about foetal moral status yield a 'pro-death' view about abortion (at the earlier stages of gestation). Anti-natalism also implies that it would be better if humanity became extinct. Although counter-intuitive for many, that implication is defended, not least by showing that it solves many conundrums of moral theory about population.

Related Books:

Better Never to Have Been
Language: en
Pages: 256
Authors: David Benatar
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2006-10-13 - Publisher: OUP Oxford

Most people believe that they were either benefited or at least not harmed by being brought into existence. Thus, if they ever do reflect on whether they should bring others into existence—-rather than having children without even thinking about whether they should—-they presume that they do them no harm. Better
Better Never to Have Been
Language: en
Pages: 237
Authors: David Benatar
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2008 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

Better Never to Have Been argues for a number of related, highly provocative, views: (1) Coming into existence is always a serious harm. (2) It is always wrong to have children. (3) It is wrong not to abort foetuses at the earlier stages of gestation. (4) It would be better
Death
Language: en
Pages: 376
Authors: Shelly Kagan
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2012-04-24 - Publisher: Yale University Press

Examines the myriad of questions that arise when confronting the meaning of mortality, challenging many widely-held views about death and inviting readers to take a fresh look at the fact that they will die.
Debating Procreation
Language: en
Pages: 280
Authors: David Benatar, David Wasserman
Categories: Philosophy
Type: BOOK - Published: 2015-06-01 - Publisher: Oxford University Press

While procreation is ubiquitous, attention to the ethical issues involved in creating children is relatively rare. In Debating Procreation, David Benatar and David Wasserman take opposing views on this important question. David Benatar argues for the anti-natalist view that it is always wrong to bring new people into existence. He
The Works of the Late Rev. Robert Murray McCheyne
Language: en
Pages:
Authors: Robert Murray M'Cheyne
Categories: Presbyterian Church
Type: BOOK - Published: 1847 - Publisher:

Books about The Works of the Late Rev. Robert Murray McCheyne